Drone jammers tackle drone threats from perfectjammer's blog

The risks posed by the misuse of drones have grown exponentially in recent years. The purpose of this short article is to examine the risks that one should take when using drone jammer.

The threat of drones is wide-ranging, starting with the use of drones by ISIS in combat in various countries, to reconnaissance drone flights by Iranian drones in military operations over the U.S. fleet in the Gulf, to civilian use of drones. Human-machine inadvertent infiltration. most likely) to the airport airspace.
Drone threats fall into two main operational concerns. The first is detection which can be achieved through a number of techniques, most likely through radar, passive RF detection, cameras, etc. The second, more acute, is the countermeasures. Few methods have been introduced so far, such as prayer birds, cast nets, short-range guns, hacking, and deception, but the most popular and cost-effective method of operation is to suppress RF signals from drones and controllers.

When countermeasures are raised to various security entities and airport authorities, several questions immediately arise because the main question is: "What if the drone lands on someone's head? One security guard even stated that he I'd rather have a plane crash than a drone on a child's head.

Before answering this serious dilemma, it is prudent to explore the well-known causes of the drone threat in most countries today, but few practical steps have been taken to mitigate the phenomenon. Here are a few reasons why the risk has yet to be responded to:

Missing 9/11: Every security measure taken is usually based on a tragedy in which many people lost their lives, such as 9/11 before security measures were taken. In our case, the question is we should ask ourselves 'why do we always need tragedy to deploy the required safety measures? The answer to this lies in the second argument.

Uav161616566
Psychological factors: Even when fully aware of the danger, people rarely take preventive measures. Examples are numerous, starting with people smoking, drinking and driving, etc. Also, since 9/11 has yet to happen, security groups will go the extra mile to ask their superiors to allocate funds for this threat. One might even argue that because of their size, it's hard to detect that something so small can do a lot of damage.

Regulations: In many countries, prohibitions are illegal unless specifically permitted by state authorities.


Liability: Use of countermeasures that may affect the environment and cause harm to hold safety agencies liable for litigation.

Overall, many security agencies seem to be looking for a panacea, a 100% security solution, a countermeasure system that would allow them to control every existing drone from great distances (several kilometers), while The cost of the system will be roughly equivalent to the cost of a small luxury car (about $100,000).

So how is the risk of using countermeasures such as RF suppression calculated compared to the risks involved? The solution always lies in the perception of the threat and the technical solution. The risk of advertising falling from the sky is very real, the world counts near misses every day, and it’s only a matter of time before drones cause planes to crash. Now, while the probability of a drone crashing into a commercial flight is on the rise (more drones are being used every day), the risk of a drone crashing on someone's head is extremely low.


Let's explain why: First, most drones have a flight home feature, which means that once I suppress the controller and the drone's connection to the ground, I can leave the GPS connection unblocked, allowing the drone to fly home. controller.

This method of operation is likely to solve nearly 100% of the problem of drones floating away or falling from the sky. Second, once a specific area has been secured, a thorough analysis can determine where the drone is most likely to land safely if GPS is also suppressed. In addition, various other techniques in the method of operation of the system can be used in conjunction with the use of a drone signal jammer to disrupt the flight of the drone without causing it to fall to the ground.

Related Articles

Drone jammer: Trends in Counter Drone Technology
Drone jammers become the workhorse of future warfare

Comparison of drone jammer technology between China and the United States

Illegal ways of using drones around the world
Drone hacking is easier than previously thought


Previous post     
     Next post
     Blog home

The Wall

No comments
You need to sign in to comment